RSS

Survey Results

29 Dec

Thank you for taking part! You have contributed to bringing the solution a step closer. Here is an excerpt of the survey results.

A Need?
Around 62 people from around the world have taken part in the survey and the results shown that a large majority want an affordable, safe and secure bike parking system.
Chart result for safe and secure bike parking

Where?
The survey listed major congregation points such as railway, bus and subway stations, office complexes, inner cities, metropolitan areas and shopping centres. There was also a wish to have such facilities at schools and universities. Generally just about everywhere in cities. The results show that around 70-90% of respondents wish to have such facilities at these places.
Parking choices

A Charge?
A majority of users are indeed willing to pay a reasonable fee to use such a facility. Though these survey results show that a large majority are for such fees, experience has shown that around 50% of users will be willing to use and pay for such a facility. As and when insurance companies start factoring in security of bike parking, as is done with automobiles today, there will be a marked influence on insurance premiums. Among various factors that play a role are ease and security of use. A system that requires entering buildings or parking underground tend to put off many, especially women. The key lies in tackling this problem and offering a solution avoiding these pitfalls.
Chart result for safe and secure bike parking charges

How Often?
Respondents have shown that a facility operating 24/7 is preferred. There is a strong need to have the reassurance that a bike can be parked at any time of the day or night with no risk of theft or damage.
Chart result for safe and secure bike parking usage

Use Your Bike More Often?
If such a facility is available, people are willing to use their bikes more often. In effect, among other factors such as bike lanes etc., undoubtedly this would go some way in encouraging use of bikes in cities.
Chart result for safe and secure bike parking usage increase

Combination of Bike Parking and Renting?
The flexibility of using one’s own bike or renting one plays a role in the freedom to choose with a 50-50 split. Having said that, this is an important factor for those who seek to rent a bike in a quick and easy manner, especially when one does not use one’s own or even own a bike.
Parking and renting

Comments
Quite a few comments have been added in the survey. Check out a few below:

    Additional requirements: guaranteed space (to avoid taking an expensive bike to the station, only to find out that there is no space available) and a facility for simple maintenance (e.g. facility to inflate tires).
    I would think that secure bike parking would be a priority at night – for example, say I was out late with friends.
    The facility needs to provide (potential) users with the reassurance that if the machine breaks down (e.g. when you want to pick up your bike at night after arriving at the station with the last train) they can still get to their bike somehow.
    Maybe these facilities would do well at transit/rail stations outside the centre. If folks could ride a mile or 2 to a rail, bus, or tram stop then safely park for the day, and feel 100% confident that the bike will not be stolen/tampered with, that would be extremely important. Then when you get to the city centre, or inner city…that’s where you could pick up a bike share if needed. We need safe cycling routes to rail/bus park and rides then! And of course to schools, with 5 mph speed limits within any bike crossings during school transport times.
    Having a safe, secure place to park my bike is a major plus–I can go about my business on my bike and not be worried it will be stolen or ruined by the elements.
    Ride a bike. It’s fun!
    Go go go!!!
Advertisements
 
3 Comments

Posted by on December 29, 2009 in Environment, Mobility, Transport

 

Tags: , , , ,

3 responses to “Survey Results

  1. Chris

    January 13, 2010 at 16:08

    I must say that I really hate the method of displaying the results. Pie charts make sense, but the 3D pie charts used completely distort the results. For instance, in the how much to pay chart, the 34% area is about 5 times bigger than the 28% area. The point of pie charts is so that the proportions can be compared visually, but this completely destroys that ability, and one has to still read the numbers to have any idea of the actual proportions. I hope you can change this.

     
    • sambridge

      January 13, 2010 at 18:42

      Chris,

      The perspective plays a predominant role here. The shallow angle and the minimal distance from the eye to the pie (no pun intended!) causes the distortion. If the smaller area had been turned to the front, it would have a similar effect.

      The distortion was not on purpose, but could well be a marketing strategy practiced by some – Fare price in huge letters all other taxes and charges in small type.

      Sorry that it seems to have caused such unhappiness to you.

       

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: